Describe the extent to which the Singaporean economy was affected by the 2008-9 global financial


Notice: Undefined variable: single_post_nav in /home/enlwrite/public_html/USCustomPapers.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/includes/content-single.php on line 33

Notice: Undefined variable: post_prev in /home/enlwrite/public_html/USCustomPapers.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/includes/content-single.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined variable: post_next in /home/enlwrite/public_html/USCustomPapers.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/includes/content-single.php on line 35

Notice: Undefined variable: single_post_nav in /home/enlwrite/public_html/USCustomPapers.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/includes/content-single.php on line 46

Notice: Undefined variable: post_prev in /home/enlwrite/public_html/USCustomPapers.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/includes/content-single.php on line 47

Notice: Undefined variable: post_next in /home/enlwrite/public_html/USCustomPapers.com/wp-content/themes/betheme/includes/content-single.php on line 47

    Describe the extent to which the Singaporean economy was affected by the 2008-9 global financialcrisis
    Describe the extent to which the Singaporean economy was affected by the 2008-9 global financial
    crisis, and the reasons for this.

    Overall word limit 4,000 words

    Should focused on:

    1. How crisis starts?

    2. Effects on Singapore?

    Eg: what MAS did?

    3. Why? Why MAS act so fast than other country?

    4. Aftermath.

    15BSB695 FSMI coursework 1 15BSB695 Financial Systems, Markets and Institutions Group Coursework
    GROUP TASK With explicit reference to the concepts and topics covered in your 15BSB695 lectures,
    describe the extent to which the Singaporean economy was affected by the 2008-9 global financial
    crisis, and the reasons for this. Overall word limit 4,000 words (see next page) 15BSB695 FSMI
    coursework 2 Coursework Notes: 1. This is a group assignment. Student groups (minimum 3 members,
    max. 5 members) should be chosen by students and advised to Christopher Spencer and David Tan by
    Friday 11th March 2016. 2. Each GROUP member will be awarded a mark based on the GROUP mark. 3. The
    report will count 25% towards your overall assessment in this module. 4. The report should be of a
    maximum 4,000 words. The word count excludes references and relevant appendix materials (maximum 10
    pages) but includes tables, reference citations in the text, diagrams, contents pages and headings.
    Reports that are over-length will have marks deducted by 1% for every 100 words over the limit.
    There are no specific word limits on each part of this task as areas do overlap and a more
    integrated report is sought. 5. The report should be submitted via the Coursework box by 7pm on
    Friday 6th May 2016, together with a Group Coursework coversheet. 6. The assessment criteria noted
    in Appendix A will be used to mark this assessment and as a basis for feedback. 15BSB695 FSMI
    coursework 3 Appendix A 12BSB695 Group Coursework Assignment – Criteria for assessment In assessing
    the assignment the following equally weighted criteria will be used. The statements in the mark
    ranges are indicative. Criterion <40% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% >70% Content Very basic detail, some
    inaccurate reporting of case. Little detail or explanation, general “headlines” without much
    supporting text. Reasonable level of detail. Some key points missed. Good level of detail and
    explanation. Most key points covered. Clear facts, very well explained, Good level of detail (not
    overboard) Use of models / concepts No basis in theory or accepted models. Basic use of theory,
    derived from lectures alone. Good use of theory, based largely on lectures Good use of relevant
    theories /models / concepts extending beyond the lecture notes. Excellent use of relevant theories
    and models, extending beyond the lecture notes. Evidence of Research No citations / references.
    Statements have no supporting evidence. Statements often not supported by evidence, few sources
    cited. Statements supported, some meaningful research undertaken. Good referencing, statements
    supported by evidence. Good sources used. Wide range of research. Excellent sources of data and
    references. Analysis / application No real analysis or application of theories. Descriptive,
    shallow, shows basic information without any analysis. Good attempt to analyse, or prioritise
    issues. Good attempt to analyse, or prioritise issues and to draw conclusions. Evidence of
    argument, analysis and discussion. Good conclusions drawn. Presentation of report Unstructured,
    messy, spelling and grammar mistakes Neat and tidy but with no real structure. Some spelling
    errors. Well presented with minimal errors. Room for improvement in structure. Well presented with
    a good attempt to structure. Good logical structure, neat and tidy. Good “signposts” (headers /
    footers / sub-headings)

                                                                                                                                                                   Order Now